1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 642 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Thunderbird | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Thunderbird | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1577 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |
