1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 144 kg more than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Thunderbird | CL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |