1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward

To start off, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,377 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 952 kg more than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (252 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Thunderbird.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Thunderbird 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
Make Ford Rolls-Royce
Model Thunderbird Park Ward
Year Released 1982 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 5377 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 322 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 252 Nm 499 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.6 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.7:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1448 kg 2400 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 3360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 100 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]