1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (209 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | Tribute |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 62 L |