1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (209 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Thunderbird | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3275 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
