1982 GAZ 24 vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 GAZ 24.
Because 1982 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 GAZ 24 | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | 24 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |
