1982 GAZ 24 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 224 kg more than 1982 GAZ 24.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1982 GAZ 24 has manual transmission. 1982 GAZ 24 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 GAZ 24 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | GAZ | Ford |
Model | 24 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2838 mm |