1982 GAZ 24 vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 19 kg more than 1982 GAZ 24.
Because 1982 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 GAZ 24 | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | 24 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1499 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2790 mm |
