1982 Ginetta G4 vs. 1986 Pontiac 6000

To start off, 1986 Pontiac 6000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ginetta G4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ginetta G4 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Pontiac 6000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ginetta G4 (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Pontiac 6000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ginetta G4 should accelerate faster than 1986 Pontiac 6000.

Because 1982 Ginetta G4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ginetta G4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Pontiac 6000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ginetta G4 1986 Pontiac 6000
Make Ginetta Pontiac
Model G4 6000
Year Released 1982 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1600 cc 2474 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 89 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]