1982 GMC Suburban vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 GMC Suburban. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 GMC Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 GMC Suburban weights approximately 363 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 GMC Suburban. (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 GMC Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
1982 GMC Suburban | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Suburban | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2230 kg | 1867 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |