1982 GMC Suburban vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1982 GMC Suburban. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 GMC Suburban.
Because 1982 GMC Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 GMC Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 GMC Suburban. (285 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 GMC Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 GMC Suburban | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Suburban | Calais |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
