1982 Holden Camira vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1982 Holden Camira is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Camira (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Camira weights approximately 128 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Camira (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Camira | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | 616 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |