1982 Holden Camira vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Camira (86 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Camira (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Camira | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Holden | Proton |
Model | Camira | 400 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |