1982 Holden Camira vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Camira weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 125 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Holden Camira | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camira | Colt |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
