1982 Holden Camira vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Camira (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 155 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (200 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Camira | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Camira | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1195 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |