1982 Holden Camira vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT (134 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT weights approximately 585 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Camira | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | Camira | ZT |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |