1982 Holden Camira vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Holden Camira | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Camira | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |
