1982 Holden Commodore vs. 1974 Mazda 929

To start off, 1982 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1982 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Commodore weights approximately 65 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Commodore (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Holden Commodore 1974 Mazda 929
Make Holden Mazda
Model Commodore 929
Year Released 1982 1974
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1892 cc 1767 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 78 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 140 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1160 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2520 mm