1982 Holden Commodore vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1982 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Commodore | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Commodore | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3193 mm |