1982 Holden Gemini vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1982 Holden Gemini is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 195 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Holden | Riley |
Model | Gemini | RM A |
Year Released | 1982 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1816 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |