1982 Holden Gemini vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1982 Holden Gemini is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Gemini weights approximately 446 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Gemini | Elan |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1816 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2140 mm |