1982 Holden Gemini vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1992 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Gemini | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |