1982 Holden Gemini vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Holden | Kia |
Model | Gemini | Elan |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1816 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2270 mm |