1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 400 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 855 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 737 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Holden Gemini | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Gemini | XKA |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2590 mm |
