1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Gemini weights approximately 65 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.

Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.

Compare all specifications: