1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (280 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Gemini | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1816 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |