1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 441 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Holden Gemini | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Gemini | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
