1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Gemini (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Gemini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Gemini | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |