1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 125 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Gemini | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |