1982 Holden Gemini vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 799 kg more than 1982 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Gemini | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Gemini | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1816 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2423 mm |