1982 Holden Statesman vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Statesman (170 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1982 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Statesman (361 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Statesman | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Statesman | 5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2760 mm |