1982 Holden Statesman vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Statesman would be higher.
Because 1982 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Statesman | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Statesman | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |