1982 Holden Statesman vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1982 Holden Statesman. (170 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Statesman.
Because 1982 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Holden Statesman (361 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Statesman | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Statesman | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |