1982 Honda Accord vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1982 Honda Accord is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Honda Accord. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Accord.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Honda Accord | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Accord | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1602 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
