1982 Honda Ballade vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Honda Ballade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Honda Ballade would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1982 Honda Ballade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Ballade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 417 kg more than 1982 Honda Ballade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Ballade. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Ballade.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Honda Ballade | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Ballade | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1335 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2650 mm |