1982 Honda Prelude vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1982 Honda Prelude is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Honda Prelude (90 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Honda Prelude should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Honda Prelude.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Prelude. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Prelude.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Honda Prelude | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Honda | Triumph |
Model | Prelude | 2000 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1750 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |