1982 Honda Prelude vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Honda Prelude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Honda Prelude would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1982 Honda Prelude. (90 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Prelude. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 480 kg more than 1982 Honda Prelude. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Prelude. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Prelude.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Honda Prelude | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Honda | Lancia |
| Model | Prelude | Nea |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1750 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2590 mm |
