1982 Hyundai Pony vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Hyundai Pony. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Hyundai Pony would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1982 Hyundai Pony.
Because 1982 Hyundai Pony is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Hyundai Pony. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1982 Hyundai Pony has manual transmission. 1982 Hyundai Pony will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Hyundai Pony | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Hyundai | Volvo |
| Model | Pony | C70 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1437 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1661 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |
