1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso vs. 2011 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2011 Ford Kuga is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso.
Because 2011 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso | 2011 Ford Kuga | |
| Make | Innocenti | Ford |
| Model | Turbo De Tomaso | Kuga |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3140 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 53 L |
