1982 Isuzu Florian vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Isuzu Florian. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Isuzu Florian would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Isuzu Florian. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1982 Isuzu Florian.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Isuzu Florian. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Isuzu Florian. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Isuzu Florian.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Isuzu Florian | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Florian | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1817 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3010 mm |
