1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1982 Jaguar XJR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 11 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | XJR | Elan |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 889 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 59 L |
