1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 1999 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1999 SsangYong Korando is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 930 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1999 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 1999 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Jaguar | SsangYong |
| Model | XJR | Korando |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |
