1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XJR | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2477 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 74 L |
