1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1269 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jaguar XJR | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJR | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2169 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 78 L |