1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | BMW |
| Model | XJR | X6 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4879 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1689 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2934 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 85 L |
