1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 302 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Citroen |
Model | XJR | C3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 45 L |