1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Maybach 62
To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,500 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1976 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Jaguar | Maybach |
Model | XJR | 62 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 543 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 110 L |