1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 742 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XJR | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1642 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2738 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |
