1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1752 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | XJR | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |
