1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 493 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Jeep | Reliant |
Model | CJ7 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2290 mm |